|© 2000 The Docket and Denver Bar Association. All Rights Reserved.
All material from The Docket provided via this World Wide Web server is copyrighted by the Denver Bar Association. Before accessing any specific article, click here for disclaimer information.
What Do You Think About MDP?
by Diane Hartman
What do you think about all this?
Responses can be sent to:
Susan Smith Fisher, 9200 W. Cross Drive, #321, Littleton CO 80123-2224; phone (303)932-0530, or e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org OR Dale Harris, Davis, Graham & Stubbs LLP, 370 – 17th Street, # 4700, Denver, CO 80202, phone (303) 892-9400, or e-mail: email@example.com
Why would you want an MDP to come sit in your lap?
A) It might put money in your pocket? or B) It’s going to sit in your lap whether you want it or not and you might as well be gracious?
To tell the truth, MDP isn’t a breed of big, thumping dog. It’s a new form of law practice, one we’re asking your opinion about.
MDP, multidisciplinary practice, means having lawyers work with other professionals in one office—in essence, offering consumers "one-stop shopping." It’s a reality in some other countries. One of the first inroads in the U.S. is in Washington, D.C., where a law firm, under the ownership of an accounting firm, provides full legal services to clients. In Boston, a law firm has formed a partnership with an investment company to provide asset management services.
Recently, an ABA commission proposed that the Model Rules of Professional Conduct be amended to permit MDPs under certain conditions. A vote is expected at the July ABA meeting; they have asked for input from bars before that vote.
The CBA and DBA formed a task force (led by CBA president-elect Dale Harris and DBA president-elect Susan Smith Fisher). The task force has divided into groups to study the proposal, and expects to have a recommendation for the Board of Governors and the DBA Board of Trustees in May. Please go to the CBA home page (www.cobar.org) where you’ll see a section on MDP and can e-mail your comments (or send to the addresses at the bottom of the page).
Basically, the ABA commission proposed that lawyers be permitted to share fees with non-lawyers and that lawyers be allowed to practice in firms or organizations that provide both legal and non-legal services, and have either direct or indirect sharing of profits. The recommendation also says the Rules of Professional Conduct would still apply to lawyers in MDPs, that the Rules of Professional Conduct that apply to a law firm would apply to an MDP, and that all clients of the MDP should be treated as if they’re clients of lawyers for purposes of conflicts of interest.
Much debate is going on in the legal community about the proposal.
Some concerns: Will core values of the legal profession (i.e., confidentiality, independence of professional judgment, loyalty to clients) be preserved? Is there a real need for legal services to be provided through MDPs? Would passive or equity investments in law firms still be prohibited? Who would regulate a combination of professions?
Can independence of the legal professional’s judgment be safeguarded when practicing in an MDP controlled by other professions with other interests?
A typical problem is what might happen in a combined accounting/law firm where there’s an audit to be done for a client. The accountants’ job is to report publicly any critical information while the lawyers have an obligation to keep the attorney/client privilege. The ABA sees this as a huge conflict.
While voicing concerns, some also point out that MDP would increase the availability of legal services and would encourage lawyers to reconfigure their practices to help clients in resolving problems that are entwined with various areas—say engineering and accounting.
The CBA/DBA taskforce first wants Colorado attorneys to be educated about the subject. The group wants input from Colorado lawyers about whether (and how) Colorado should allow MDPs, input from those in other professions that might be touched and input from consumers of legal serv-
ices. The task force will be studying the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct and other rules that govern attorneys’ conduct to pinpoint changes if MDP is permitted in Colorado.
"The time is very limited," Susan Smith Fisher pointed out. "It’s critically important that Colorado lawyers voice their opinions. We expect to complete the study phase and come to our conclusions and recommendations by the end of March, and draft a report to the boards in May."
These boards may, in turn, vote on the recommendations and give guidance to our ABA House of Delegates reps for the July ABA meeting.
"Our world is becoming a much smaller place." Fisher continued. "Some people see our legal system as antiquated, with state by state discipline, for instance. We already have lawyers practicing in multiple jurisdictions. What you can’t do here, in some cases you can do in some other state, or vice versa.
"MDP debates set the stage for examining some of the larger issues—for example, whether global practice of law is really ever going to occur."